PimpDaddyInDaCaddy
Feb 15 2006, 3:44:45 AM
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/5329722This has to be the worst mock draft I've seen. There were top 10 players falling and there were a lot of reaches, and teams not taking the best player or drafting out of need. There were teams taking players that don't even fit there scheme!! The saddest part is it was posted on foxsports meaning this guy is a proffesional. The part I really didnt get is the Chargers' pick because he was basically saying they were switching to 43. Is that even true? I would like some feed back imediately this draft is horrible and I want to know what other people think.
Rock
Feb 15 2006, 5:32:40 AM
ill take mario!!
joebeans
Feb 15 2006, 12:05:54 PM
the pats pick in that mock might be the worst pick ive ever seen. How much younger can they get on the dline. Warren, Wilfork, Seymour, all first round pics in the past 4 years.
scar988
Feb 15 2006, 1:08:34 PM
QUOTE
15. Atlanta Falcons - Winston Justice, OT USC
Not a need, but the athletic tackle will have a hard time falling out of the top 15.
so they can't give any analysis on the Falcons? just like fox. they are the biggest retards hwne it comes to Atlanta. but in general it is just a plain horrible mock too.
bigbrewster2000
Feb 15 2006, 1:42:17 PM
That is really terrible. It looks like a 10 year old looked at some names and threw them on some teams.
PimpDaddyInDaCaddy
Feb 15 2006, 4:02:45 PM
QUOTE(bigbrewster2000 @ Feb 15 2006, 01:42 PM)
That is really terrible. It looks like a 10 year old looked at some names and threw them on some teams.
LOL
Scar I've seen a couple of mocks where the Falcons pick a rb because they trying to get rid of Duckett. Do you think they will take a RB that high?
scar988
Feb 15 2006, 4:15:16 PM
QUOTE(PimpDaddyInDaCaddy @ Feb 15 2006, 04:02 PM)
QUOTE(bigbrewster2000 @ Feb 15 2006, 01:42 PM)
That is really terrible. It looks like a 10 year old looked at some names and threw them on some teams.
LOL
Scar I've seen a couple of mocks where the Falcons pick a rb because they trying to get rid of Duckett. Do you think they will take a RB that high?
nope. I doubt we even get a RB i nthe first 2 rounds.
PimpDaddyInDaCaddy
Feb 15 2006, 4:26:50 PM
QUOTE(scar988 @ Feb 15 2006, 04:15 PM)
QUOTE(PimpDaddyInDaCaddy @ Feb 15 2006, 04:02 PM)
QUOTE(bigbrewster2000 @ Feb 15 2006, 01:42 PM)
That is really terrible. It looks like a 10 year old looked at some names and threw them on some teams.
LOL
Scar I've seen a couple of mocks where the Falcons pick a rb because they trying to get rid of Duckett. Do you think they will take a RB that high?
nope. I doubt we even get a RB i nthe first 2 rounds.
me too.
ramfan11
Feb 15 2006, 5:46:59 PM
The top picks aren't that bad, but the later ones are horrible! Honestly I haven't even heard of DT, John McCargo? And once again the Rams have the least explanation of their pick... Who ever wrote this needs help.
BigDan13
Feb 15 2006, 6:34:19 PM
well at least the raiders get mario williams
bipolarboy
Feb 15 2006, 7:40:08 PM
I don't think it's that bad, actually. I agree with the RBs going early. San Fransisco taking a DB, I have issues with, and I think if you shuffle picks #14-16 it makes more sense with Kiwi going to Philly, ATL taking Williams, MIA taking Justice. The bottom of the round doesn't look great, but at this point in the off-season, it doesn't really matter.
Every major site, sticks ATL with an OT in the first for the first two or three mocks. The logic usually the same. "ATLANTA needs to protect Vick." Well, der!
nschulte13
Feb 15 2006, 7:42:34 PM
horrible horrible draft, the falcons and bengals picks suck so bad and Hawk is not going to drop that far.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.