QUOTE (thasavage1 @ Jan 5 2008, 5:45:59 AM)

Elway played 2 summer leagues which Dennis Dixon just did does that mean he is signing a baseball contact? If the yankees needed a pitcher that bad they should have taken the fat kid outta texas. I have seen Giants games where passes were dropped but i have seen too many games where Eli completed the passes just to guys in the wrong color jersey. you call Shockey overrated but what has Eli done to deserve being picked over Rivers or Big Ben? You can't deny that during the pats game you couldn't see Eli crumble right before you eyes. He just doesn't have what it takes
With your vast knowledge of what it takes to play the QB position in the NFL, perhaps you should apply for a job in personnel with the Giants so they can stop themselves from their commitment to Eli before it's too late. As far as Rivers and Big Ben are concerned, Eli's stats match up favorably with either of them. I don't know which team you root for to make you say things that are a bit immature about Eli. He, along with both Rivers and Big Ben are still very early in their respective careers, and still have much to learn before any of them will be a complete QB. However, IMO, I think all three are good young QBs, with bright futures in the NFL ahead of them, and their teams, barring injury. Here is how I break down the three of them.
Big Ben. Pluses: Arm is above average, but not great - Size/Height - makes smart reads for the most part - sees the field well - throws well on the run. manages a game well. Minuses: Does not have a quick release - deep passes tend to sail - still learning to read defenses - okay in the pocket, but is not a good scrambler.
As a Charger fan, I am very familiar with Rivers. He too has had his problems and distractions. Pluses: Great decision maker and field general. A leader. Is tall, well-built, and very durable. A tough player. Possesses great pocket presence and field vision. Makes reads easily and has a nice progression in his check downs. Has great instincts, touch, and timing. Minuses: Ordinary arm, although he has improved arm strength in off season conditioning program, but still needs work. Is working to improve terrible mechanics. Throws sidearm a lot and bounces some balls to receivers. Needs work on setting his feet and planting, sometimes hand-pats the ball slowing down his release. Also sometimes holds the ball too low when he drops back, which also slows down his release. Too much air under deep throws over the middle. A terrible runner. Sometimes has problems with the snap exchange with the center because of height and playing in a shotgun offense in college. Tends to become emotional, which he sometimes allows to interfere with the task at hand.
And now, Eli. Pluses: Great arm and can make all the throws. Excellent fundamentals, and has a high, quick release with very good footwork. Very accurate on short passes, with very good touch and timing. Can read the field and make pre-snap decisions. Moves well in the pocket and can throw on the run. Minuses: Not a great athlete. Does not have the same accuracy on his deep balls as he does on his short to medium range throws. Needs to pay more attention to detail and manage the game better. Has come on as a leader, but needs to be more "take charge," his personality may prevent him from being in the same class as his brother in this area.
All three of these QBs came into the league at the same time. Big Ben benefited by going to a veteran team on the verge of a SB, with a very strong supporting cast. His stats should be better than the other two. Rivers went to the Chargers, who were just beginning to become good, and sat behind Brees. He has the least starting experience of the three. Manning came to a Giants team that had a good RB and little else, and started mid-way through his rookie year. None of these QBs have ever had what you would call a true No1 WR, although both Ben and Eli had or have Burress, who is the closest you will come to one when he doesn't have a hang nail. Until this year, Ben has had the superior OL. All three have benefitted from playing for teams with superior rushing attacks.
I enjoy getting into discussions and debates with someone who can do so in an unbiased and intellectual format. With someone who can produce statements, statistics, or facts that at least on the surface support what he or she is saying. What I don't like, is someone whose statements consist of a bunch of generalizations with no substance behind them. Someone who sees a game or two, and suddenly becomes the next coming of a HOF GM. Someone who makes statements as if they are facts, when in fact, they are not true.
Oh yeah. One more thing. Elway was an infielder...not a pitcher. FYI, playing for Oneonta, in Class A for the NY Yankees in 1983, he hit .314 and had a club-high 24 home runs while playing 3rd base. Now, that's a fact. As they say, thasavage1, you can look it up.