ramsdraft1029
Dec 1 2007, 11:04:14 PM
I dont believe it, WV was the team to beat for me. That rushing attack was unstopable. But Pitt played great. Missouri is losing to OU Late so what teams are in the championship game. I say Ohio State, with that defense they desrve it, i guess. Lsu to me, is still the best team in the country so they are my pick for the championship.
LSU vs Ohio State
The bcs needs to go, and this years shows why
bwalker
Dec 1 2007, 11:36:26 PM
QUOTE (ramsdraft1029 @ Dec 1 2007, 11:04:14 PM)

I dont believe it, WV was the team to beat for me. That rushing attack was unstopable. But Pitt played great. Missouri is losing to OU Late so what teams are in the championship game. I say Ohio State, with that defense they desrve it, i guess. Lsu to me, is still the best team in the country so they are my pick for the championship.
LSU vs Ohio State
The bcs needs to go, and this years shows why
Ramsdraft, I don't think too many of us disagree with you. You are right! However, the stuffed suits who make the decisions can't think out of their ivory towers and it will probably stay the same. The only way it looks like we are going to get a change is if the TV networks force it or Congress. I don't like either, but let's settle this stuff on the field.
jerry14
Dec 2 2007, 12:31:48 AM
the BCS is just awful horrible dreadful all of the above. Hopefully they can change it soon. Looks like Hawaii is going to get upset also. still dont think Ohio St. should be there............. Looks like the Bulldogs and trojans are going to face off in the Rose Bowl? we all know who is gonnna win that game

USC? i think so
Asteinebach
Dec 2 2007, 12:45:22 AM
Yeah, if this year has shown one thing it is that there is no 'consensus #1' in the NCAA anymore. Parody has taken over in College football as well, but for some reason, a handful of morons at the top won't let things change. 8 game playoff is exactly what the BCS needs to be replaced with. Any one of the top 8 teams this season could be contenders for the National Championship. It's time for a change, and if this season hasn't proved that much, nothing will. I want it changed for 2008. No later. It's not hard. You change to an 8 team (16 game) Bowl Series Playoff system, and you keep all the major bowl games at the ass-end of the playoffs. It's also a great new way to add about 10-bjillion dollars in endorsements to the NCAA by making things like the "GMAC bowl" one where you could potentially see #2 and #7 ranked teams play. But enough of that for now...
I think there's no teams out there who deserve the National Championship this year. I think it should definitely be a 'share' year, and I think the first share has to go to the winner of Ohio State vs. LSU. The second share needs to go to the winner of Georgia vs. USC. Even then we're still leaving out some darn good football teams from the mix. Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, all deserve to be able to contend for the N.C. this year.
On a sidenote, Chase Daniel didn't perform up to snuff this week, so I believe Tebow is the only actual candidate for the Heisman Trophy.
jerry14
Dec 2 2007, 12:53:54 AM
QUOTE (Asteinebach @ Dec 2 2007, 5:45:22 AM)

Yeah, if this year has shown one thing it is that there is no 'consensus #1' in the NCAA anymore. Parody has taken over in College football as well, but for some reason, a handful of morons at the top won't let things change. 8 game playoff is exactly what the BCS needs to be replaced with. Any one of the top 8 teams this season could be contenders for the National Championship. It's time for a change, and if this season hasn't proved that much, nothing will. I want it changed for 2008. No later. It's not hard. You change to an 8 team (16 game) Bowl Series Playoff system, and you keep all the major bowl games at the ass-end of the playoffs. It's also a great new way to add about 10-bjillion dollars in endorsements to the NCAA by making things like the "GMAC bowl" one where you could potentially see #2 and #7 ranked teams play. But enough of that for now...
I think there's no teams out there who deserve the National Championship this year. I think it should definitely be a 'share' year, and I think the first share has to go to the winner of Ohio State vs. LSU. The second share needs to go to the winner of Georgia vs. USC. Even then we're still leaving out some darn good football teams from the mix. Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, all deserve to be able to contend for the N.C. this year.
On a sidenote, Chase Daniel didn't perform up to snuff this week, so I believe Tebow is the only actual candidate for the Heisman Trophy.
Kanses will no longer be comepeting in a Major Bowl game this season.
jerry14
Dec 2 2007, 12:55:01 AM
i agree definatly a share year. no true #1 team this year.
ramsdraft1029
Dec 2 2007, 9:10:09 AM
But LSU lossed both their games in triple overtime.
I know the BCS wont change soon but im saying it needs to
I dont see how geogia is better then lsu, kansis will get snubbed
B_rent87
Dec 2 2007, 12:48:02 PM
GO BULLDOGS. I AM A HUGE GEORGIA FAN AND MY DAWGS DESERVE IT!!!!!!!!!!! LOL even if we didnt win our division so what we outlasted everyone else, we didnt slip up in the last few games of the season like all these other chump teams. We are the most improved team down the stretch of the season and we found a great player in Knowshon to carry the load and it made a significant difference. GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!
bwalker
Dec 2 2007, 7:44:45 PM
LA TImes is reporting Ohio St. will play LSU in the BCS Championship Game.
USC plays Illinois in the Rose Bowl.
FatMike58
Dec 2 2007, 11:45:32 PM
QUOTE (jerry14 @ Dec 2 2007, 12:31:48 AM)

Looks like the Bulldogs and trojans are going to face off in the Rose Bowl? we all know who is gonnna win that game

USC? i think so
Wrong. Georgia would fart in USC's breakfast.
QUOTE
Kanses will no longer be comepeting in a Major Bowl game this season.
Wrong. Orange is pretty big right?
jerry14
Dec 3 2007, 2:39:12 PM
QUOTE (FatMike58 @ Dec 3 2007, 4:45:32 AM)

Wrong. Georgia would fart in USC's breakfast.
Wrong. Orange is pretty big right?
USC is the hottest team in the nation. No1 wants to play them. Usc should have been playing in the champoinship if not for all those injuries. They lost both games because John David Booty was out on both games. Sanchez did an okjob but nothing as much as Booty could do. They would have won at least 1 of those games with Booty. they lost both games by 1 possesion each. Usc is in the top 3 in talent and when they perform good they perform great compared to other teams. Add that with Coach Carolls ability to win most of their big games they are almost unstopable. Gergia is good but no way would they beat Usc in the Rose Bowl if both played. add that with Trojans home field advantage in the Rose Bowl.
I was said that about Kanses because of what i heard in Tv. even though i dont think they deserve to go especiallysince Missouri is getting left out the Bcs picture. shows how great the BCS works.
bcdrama
Dec 3 2007, 3:23:28 PM
WVU was my pre-season pick to win the BCS, OOOPS!

And Woodson was my preseason Heisman pick-OUCH!!

. I have always said the bowls and playoffs could peacefully co-exist. There are many non BCS-affiliated bowls they would remain essentally the same with 1 esception and the major conference winners plus 1 at large face one of the teams from the BCS-affiliated bowls that are highest rated and get in via a 'play-in' game at say the Holiday Bowl the major bowls Orange, Sugar, Fiesta, and Rose determine the team that faces the #1 team which has a bye. If all schools begin the season the week before Labor day and the regular season was dropped back to 11 games it could all be done by the time it is now if not sooner, IMHO.
QUOTE (bwalker @ Dec 2 2007, 4:36:26 AM)

Ramsdraft, I don't think too many of us disagree with you. You are right! However, the stuffed suits who make the decisions can't think out of their ivory towers and it will probably stay the same. The only way it looks like we are going to get a change is if the TV networks force it or Congress. I don't like either, but let's settle this stuff on the field.
B_rent87
Dec 4 2007, 1:49:02 AM
USC is so overrated. And you think they are hot right now why? Because they beat a couple of sorry Pac-10 teams? UCLA? That was a big win? They lost to NOTRE DAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Come on with that USC bull crap. They aren't hot right now they are as cold as ice. They won a few games, and may beat Illinois Whoo hoo, but overrated fits there bill. Injuries? Who cares, I thought USC was so stacked? I guess not! Stanford? Stanford? Notre Dame beat them too!!!!!!!! Wow what a hot team USC is playing that ever so weak Pac-10. Because Arizona State is so tough right? The team that had Kansas Syndrome, they were ranked so high because they never played anyone worth playing. So USC's overrated team got to where they belong, a Rose Bowl game, Because some Pac-10 team has to go, congratulations you Trojans are number one in the most overrated conference in football! So go play for your roses and just know if the Pac-10 Champ didn't have an automatic bid in to a BCS game you would be kicking back playing in a Toilet Bowl with UCLA! Enjoy it! Fight on mighty overated Trojans! Fight on! LMAO!!!!!!
bcdrama
Dec 5 2007, 6:35:13 PM
So you don't believe USC could have won the Big East or Big 10 this year? I agree that they or overrated but team by team the Pac 10 stacks up pretty well against the Big 10 which I believe is the most overrated BCS conference and I am not sure any Big East Team would win the Pac 10 this year, just my opinion. As you know every team got exposed once or twice this year, if this was done by playoff regions they'd face Hawi'i to take the West. I think if you ask many in and around the game you'd be suprised how many think USC would win if there were a playoff. I still think LSU might win it if there were. USC will be better next year, playing so many reserves this year created a great deal of depth. WVU will be good next year UGA will be battling with UF in the east and LSU and Auburn in the West, but watch out for MSU, Croom is a very good coach and the talent is slowly tricking his way. Out west UW will have the Pacific Tebow growing into being an allround QB, other teams that might pop up in 2009 the Pirates of ECU may get 8/9 wins, UCF might be better than USF next year, 2 Osu's Oregon State and Oklahoma State might might chalenge for 9 win seasons and Stanford will knock of at least 1 ranked team again.
QUOTE (B_rent87 @ Dec 4 2007, 6:49:02 AM)

USC is so overrated. And you think they are hot right now why? Because they beat a couple of sorry Pac-10 teams? UCLA? That was a big win? They lost to NOTRE DAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Come on with that USC bull crap. They aren't hot right now they are as cold as ice. They won a few games, and may beat Illinois Whoo hoo, but overrated fits there bill. Injuries? Who cares, I thought USC was so stacked? I guess not! Stanford? Stanford? Notre Dame beat them too!!!!!!!! Wow what a hot team USC is playing that ever so weak Pac-10. Because Arizona State is so tough right? The team that had Kansas Syndrome, they were ranked so high because they never played anyone worth playing. So USC's overrated team got to where they belong, a Rose Bowl game, Because some Pac-10 team has to go, congratulations you Trojans are number one in the most overrated conference in football! So go play for your roses and just know if the Pac-10 Champ didn't have an automatic bid in to a BCS game you would be kicking back playing in a Toilet Bowl with UCLA! Enjoy it! Fight on mighty overated Trojans! Fight on! LMAO!!!!!!
jerry14
Dec 5 2007, 8:40:12 PM
QUOTE (B_rent87 @ Dec 4 2007, 6:49:02 AM)

USC is so overrated. And you think they are hot right now why? Because they beat a couple of sorry Pac-10 teams? UCLA? That was a big win? They lost to NOTRE DAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Come on with that USC bull crap. They aren't hot right now they are as cold as ice. They won a few games, and may beat Illinois Whoo hoo, but overrated fits there bill. Injuries? Who cares, I thought USC was so stacked? I guess not! Stanford? Stanford? Notre Dame beat them too!!!!!!!! Wow what a hot team USC is playing that ever so weak Pac-10. Because Arizona State is so tough right? The team that had Kansas Syndrome, they were ranked so high because they never played anyone worth playing. So USC's overrated team got to where they belong, a Rose Bowl game, Because some Pac-10 team has to go, congratulations you Trojans are number one in the most overrated conference in football! So go play for your roses and just know if the Pac-10 Champ didn't have an automatic bid in to a BCS game you would be kicking back playing in a Toilet Bowl with UCLA! Enjoy it! Fight on mighty overated Trojans! Fight on! LMAO!!!!!!
i had a response to this but i clicked out by accident......
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.