QUOTE (Mr. Knowitall @ Dec 16 2008, 6:22:45 PM)

Whoa chill Brent.

I was making the point of saying that Bradford is badly overhyped and is made to look great by his talent around him. People call him one of the most accurate QBs they have ever seen, I was just making the point of saying that he has all day to throw. I am not going to predict he will bust in any situation because if he lands on a good team, he could be good but he's not the type of QB in my mind that you will build your franchise around, he's a guy who you bring into finish your franchise(like Big Ben did in Pitt). I guess my prediction wasn't all that bold and I guess we all have quite a few doubts on Sammy.
The problem with your prediction, Mr. Knowitall, is that normally half the QBs who go in the top of the draft come from schools where they're surrounded by top talent. How many USC QBs have been drafted in the first 15 picks in the last say, 15 years? You could also transpose your argument to any round, not just the first. It's like you're saying if you play QB for a school with a lot of talent, then it's likely you won't be a good NFL QB unless you go to a team with an equal ability to "make you look good." Basically, your argument doesn't hold up. There's really no telling in most cases how a QB will do once he is behind center in the NFL, and takes his first snap. If he can adjust to the speed of the game, and the complexity of the defenses, then he'll be successful. That's why I like what bcdrama had to say about the experience factor, rather than the near virtual vagueness of your statements.