Early reports from SI's Peter King
Garenteed money= 41.7 million
Total deal with incentives=78 million
Thats enough, Mr. Comish, put a rookie salary cap in place, this is wrong. With this economic climite i exspected the top deal to be a little lower maybe the same or 1-2 mil higher, but this is 6 million more then Matt Ryans last year. Stafford doesnt deserve this money, nobody in this years draft does.
If i had the top pick, i would pay the same amount as last years 1st. No raise, and if a prospect refuses, then i move on to the next. The Lions should of taken Aaron Curry.
Full Version: Stafford comes to terms with a ReDONKulous contract
QUOTE (ramsdraft1029 @ Apr 25 2009, 2:38:55 PM) 
Early reports from SI's Peter King
Garenteed money= 41.7 million
Total deal with incentives=78 million
Thats enough, Mr. Comish, put a rookie salary cap in place, this is wrong. With this economic climite i exspected the top deal to be a little lower maybe the same or 1-2 mil higher, but this is 6 million more then Matt Ryans last year. Stafford doesnt deserve this money, nobody in this years draft does.
If i had the top pick, i would pay the same amount as last years 1st. No raise, and if a prospect refuses, then i move on to the next. The Lions should of taken Aaron Curry.
Garenteed money= 41.7 million
Total deal with incentives=78 million
Thats enough, Mr. Comish, put a rookie salary cap in place, this is wrong. With this economic climite i exspected the top deal to be a little lower maybe the same or 1-2 mil higher, but this is 6 million more then Matt Ryans last year. Stafford doesnt deserve this money, nobody in this years draft does.
If i had the top pick, i would pay the same amount as last years 1st. No raise, and if a prospect refuses, then i move on to the next. The Lions should of taken Aaron Curry.
WAYYYYY too much money, but if he turns out to be good, I guess he'll be worth it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.